World Cup more important than selling cars.
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Webuyanycar.com, er, no they don't.
Next: Pedestrian injured in hit and run incident(Doug Mode)
From: Adrian on 26 Jun 2010 09:34 Silk <me(a)privacy.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: > The interiors also look like an 80s ghetto blaster - a bit like the new > Audis. > The Skoda is more practical and looks classier on the inside and > outside Clearly, this bit... >> Obviously, the styling of the two is a matter of preference. passed Silk by completely... >> No, you think you know that, despite my regular denials and >> explanations. That's because you don't seem able to comprehend >> "competence", "involvement", "feedback" and - especially - "character". > They're just motoring journalist bullshit. Yes, yes, yes - we know you don't understand them either.
From: Silk on 26 Jun 2010 11:39 On 26/06/2010 14:23, Mike P wrote: > On 26 June, 13:23, Silk<m...(a)privacy.net> wrote: >> If I had a Ford Puma, I'd be too ashamed to park it in public. > > No you wouldn't. You already drive a Skoda. What does that have to do with it. The Ford Puma is an ugly pile of over-priced shite and nothing can change that.
From: Mike P on 26 Jun 2010 15:11 On 26 June, 16:39, Silk <m...(a)privacy.net> wrote: > On 26/06/2010 14:23, Mike P wrote: > > > On 26 June, 13:23, Silk<m...(a)privacy.net> wrote: > >> If I had a Ford Puma, I'd be too ashamed to park it in public. > > > No you wouldn't. You already drive a Skoda. > > What does that have to do with it. The Ford Puma is an ugly pile of > over-priced shite and nothing can change that. Yet again you prove you have no idea what you are talking about. Mike P
From: Adrian on 26 Jun 2010 15:47 Mike P <mikewpearson1(a)gmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> >>>>> They now have a good reputation for reliability, good dealer >> >>>>> service, and good residuals - so it's hard to knock them really. >> >>>> Mmm. We won't get back in to priorities in cars again, eh? >> >>> Little point - we know that your priority is 'excitement'. >> >> No, you think you know that, despite my regular denials and >> >> explanations. That's because you don't seem able to comprehend >> >> "competence", "involvement", "feedback" and - especially - >> >> "character". >> > You have said yourself that excitement is important to you in a car. >> > Don't try and deny it. >> I've said I don't like dull, uninvolving, bland cars. >> >> If "excitement" (by which I presume you mean outright performance) was >> my priority, d'you think I'd absolutely adore driving 'erselfs 1.1 205? >> All 50bhp of it? Or, come to that, 2cvs? > I have been tarred with the same brush. > > That'll be why I just bought a £200 Skoda Felicia estate then... No, no, no. It's a Skoda. Silk's got a Skoda. Kev nearly bought a Skoda. You're clearly a man of taste and discernment. I could quite fancy a Rapid, if there were many left.
From: Clive George on 26 Jun 2010 15:53
On 26/06/2010 20:13, Mike P wrote: > That'll be why I just bought a �200 Skoda Felicia estate then... Not as bland as a fabia estate. When I first parked next to one, it was as if somebody had put a somebody else's problem field over it. Made a corolla look interesting. Still, probably entirely competent cars. |