Car damages cemetery.
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: The Medway Handyman on 11 Apr 2010 07:37 Mrcheerful wrote: > thomas wrote: >> waiting for the idiots to come back and blame the cemetery for >> damaging a car :( > > Well, clearly large lumps of heavy stone sticking up out of the > ground do represent a hazard to all and sundry and someone is > responsible for putting them there, and where there's blame there's a > claim. Whoever is responsible should issue a written undertaking that it won't happen again. -- Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.
From: Tony Dragon on 11 Apr 2010 08:00 thomas wrote: > waiting for the idiots to come back and blame the cemetery for damaging > a car :( > > "Doug" <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote in message > news:40734ef7-5e20-47f7-8d5b-fa1f09827782(a)y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... >> Once again demonstrating the sheer destructive force of a car compared >> to the much maligned bicycle. >> >> "A woman from South Gloucestershire has said she is "devastated" by >> the damage she caused at a cemetery after losing control of her car. >> >> Shirley Potts, who is a Labour member of South Gloucestershire >> Council, was visiting Mangotsfield Cemetery on Easter Sunday to tend >> her son's grave. >> >> She lost control of her new car and accidentally drove over the >> memorials. >> >> Mrs Potts said she was advised not to contact the police but report it >> to the council when their offices reopened. >> >> After laying flowers on her son's grave, Mrs Potts, who had owned the >> vehicle for a month, was trying to leave when her foot slipped and >> caught on the accelerator. >> >> "It all happened so fast, the car just shot forward," she said..." >> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/8610549.stm >> >> It wasn't a Toyota by any chance was it? If it was no doubt we shall >> never be allowed to know. >> >> -- >> UK Radical Campaigns >> www.zing.icom43.net >> A driving licence is a licence to kill. > Well the body of opinion might tell you that you are on a dead loser there. -- Tony Dragon
From: Adrian on 11 Apr 2010 08:09 Tony Dragon <tony.dragon(a)btinternet.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: > thomas wrote: >> waiting for the idiots to come back and blame the cemetery for damaging >> a car :( > Well the body of opinion might tell you that you are on a dead loser > there. I would make some crack about "headstone", but - in the Tooomtard's case - the internal repetition in the word is just overwhelming.
From: Brimstone on 11 Apr 2010 12:49 "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:Iviwn.258530$0t.192391(a)newsfe17.ams2... > Mrcheerful wrote: >> thomas wrote: >>> waiting for the idiots to come back and blame the cemetery for >>> damaging a car :( >> >> Well, clearly large lumps of heavy stone sticking up out of the >> ground do represent a hazard to all and sundry and someone is >> responsible for putting them there, and where there's blame there's a >> claim. > > Whoever is responsible should issue a written undertaking that it won't > happen again. > A person issuing such an undertaking would surely be the undertaker?
From: The Medway Handyman on 11 Apr 2010 12:55
Brimstone wrote: > "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in > message news:Iviwn.258530$0t.192391(a)newsfe17.ams2... >> Mrcheerful wrote: >>> thomas wrote: >>>> waiting for the idiots to come back and blame the cemetery for >>>> damaging a car :( >>> >>> Well, clearly large lumps of heavy stone sticking up out of the >>> ground do represent a hazard to all and sundry and someone is >>> responsible for putting them there, and where there's blame there's >>> a claim. >> >> Whoever is responsible should issue a written undertaking that it >> won't happen again. >> > A person issuing such an undertaking would surely be the undertaker? Whoooosh. -- Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport. |