Car damages cemetery.
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Brimstone on 11 Apr 2010 13:08 "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:panwn.25423$5x6.10762(a)newsfe04.ams2... > Brimstone wrote: >> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >> message news:Iviwn.258530$0t.192391(a)newsfe17.ams2... >>> Mrcheerful wrote: >>>> thomas wrote: >>>>> waiting for the idiots to come back and blame the cemetery for >>>>> damaging a car :( >>>> >>>> Well, clearly large lumps of heavy stone sticking up out of the >>>> ground do represent a hazard to all and sundry and someone is >>>> responsible for putting them there, and where there's blame there's >>>> a claim. >>> >>> Whoever is responsible should issue a written undertaking that it >>> won't happen again. >>> >> A person issuing such an undertaking would surely be the undertaker? > > Whoooosh. > Glad to see you admit that you didn't understand.
From: BrianW on 11 Apr 2010 13:10 On Apr 11, 11:32�am, "thomas" <t0...(a)luvaduck.com> wrote: > waiting for the idiots to come back and blame the cemetery for damaging a > car :( Well, if it isn't my old meths-guzzling mate Timmy. Been on B&Q's finest lately?
From: Derek Geldard on 11 Apr 2010 18:33 On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:53:55 -0700 (PDT), FrengaX <hnkjqrh02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: >On Apr 10, 8:13�am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >> Once again demonstrating the sheer destructive force of a car compared >> to the much maligned bicycle. > >Still having to convince yourself of this, I see. Most people know >that cars are heavy objects, and driving them into things isn't going >to end happily. > >Anyway, "car runs over people who are already dead" is hardly >newsworthy. OTOH, "car runs over people who are already dead - not many injured", would be slightly better. Derek
From: Doug on 12 Apr 2010 02:38 On 11 Apr, 23:33, Derek Geldard <im...(a)miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:53:55 -0700 (PDT), FrengaX > > <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: > >On Apr 10, 8:13 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: > >> Once again demonstrating the sheer destructive force of a car compared > >> to the much maligned bicycle. > > >Still having to convince yourself of this, I see. Most people know > >that cars are heavy objects, and driving them into things isn't going > >to end happily. > > >Anyway, "car runs over people who are already dead" is hardly > >newsworthy. > > OTOH, "car runs over people who are already dead - not many injured", > would be slightly better. > How about, "The dead manage to damage a car by getting in its way and hindering its right to pass and repass. The driver said she was 'devastated'"? -- UK Radical Campaigns www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill.
From: Tony Dragon on 12 Apr 2010 02:55
Doug wrote: > On 11 Apr, 23:33, Derek Geldard <im...(a)miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:53:55 -0700 (PDT), FrengaX >> >> <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: >>> On Apr 10, 8:13 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >>>> Once again demonstrating the sheer destructive force of a car compared >>>> to the much maligned bicycle. >>> Still having to convince yourself of this, I see. Most people know >>> that cars are heavy objects, and driving them into things isn't going >>> to end happily. >>> Anyway, "car runs over people who are already dead" is hardly >>> newsworthy. >> OTOH, "car runs over people who are already dead - not many injured", >> would be slightly better. >> > How about, "The dead manage to damage a car by getting in its way and > hindering its right to pass and repass. The driver said she was > 'devastated'"? > > -- > UK Radical Campaigns > www.zing.icom43.net > A driving licence is a licence to kill. > No, because that would be a lie. -- Tony Dragon |