From: Noddy on

"Kev" <kevcat(a)optunet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4c4d1d15$0$11181$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...

> Two things
> How many people who own a pre 95 car would be in a position to buy a new
> car? even with $2000 extra
> And
> How does trading in their old car take it off the road??

To answer your questions in order, very few I'd imagine and it doesn't.

To take it further, it's a government "scheme", and what's worse it's being
offered up as an election sweetener. It's virtually *guaranteed* to do
absolutely nothing other than cost money.

> is there a directive that the traded cars on this scheme be scrapped by
> the dealer? and does there have to be confirmation that it is destroyed?
> or is it listed on the write or register to never be registered on road
> and the engine number not used again?

I'd doubt it :)

--
Regards,
Noddy.


From: Noddy on

"hippo" <am9obmhAc2hvYWwubmV0LmF1(a)REGISTERED_USER_usenet.com.au> wrote in
message news:i2j8i8$imq$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...

> And we've all seen how well schemes like *that* have worked so far,
> haven't we?

Indeed we have.

House burned down with "free" insulation anyone?

--
Regards,
Noddy.


From: Noddy on

"Mr.T" <MrT(a)home> wrote in message
news:4c4d1b11$0$32441$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...

> Sure you are, you are forced to pay taxes so it can be given to someone
> else
> who may need it even less than you do!

I'm forced to pay taxes *period*, but I have no say in how that money is
allocated.

Just like anyone else.

--
Regards,
Noddy.


From: Atheist Chaplain on

"PHATRS" <stoptryingtosp(a)m.me> wrote in message
news:i2j0o0$gls$1(a)news.albasani.net...
> On 26/07/10 13:47, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> "PHATRS"<stoptryingtosp(a)m.me> wrote in message
>> news:i2iv7j$f1h$1(a)news.albasani.net...
>>> On 26/07/10 13:15, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> "Noddy"<Mission.Control(a)NASA.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:4c4cf6fc$0$12395$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Trevor Wilson"<trevor(a)rageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>> news:8b3tvvFn0tU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's see the Pollys place themselves into Diesels or Prius' BEFORE I
>>>>>> am
>>>>>> forced to trade up(?) to a new car.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Shakes head]
>>>>>
>>>>> As I understand it, Gillard's version of the "cash for clunkers"
>>>>> scheme
>>>>> is
>>>>> an incentive, not compulsory, so I don't think anyone will be forcing
>>>>> you
>>>>> to do anything.
>>>>
>>>> **I agree. Part of point is that it is highly likely that my 'clunker'
>>>> manages better fuel consumption than the PM's Com-Car. If pollies want
>>>> us
>>>> to
>>>> invest in better fuel economy, then they should be driving around in
>>>> Prius'
>>>> (or is that Priii?) or a Diesel first. Those boats that most pollies
>>>> tool
>>>> around in are horrible consumers of fuel.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> 'cept priiii aren't big enough for the fat cats.
>>
>> **Anyone too big to fit into a Prius won't be alive much longer. They
>> should
>> be walking anyway.
>>
>>
>
> My point was that Priiii are not big limo-like cars. Not big enough for
> the egos of pollies.

So what about a Lexus Hybrid SUV ??

From: bugalugs on
On 26/07/2010 6:04 p.m., hippo wrote:
> Kev wrote:
>>
>> Noddy wrote:
>>> "Bernd Felsche"<berfel(a)innovative.iinet.net.au> wrote in message
>>> news:18evh7x0p4.ln2(a)innovative.iinet.net.au...
>>>
>>>> Where are the $2000 * 200,000 coming from, Noddy?
>>>> Not out of Gillard'spension, that's for sure.
>>>
>>> Of course not. If it were, you'd never hear of such a ridiculous plan being
>>> mentioned :)
>>>
>>>> Taxpayers are being forced to pay for it.
>>>
>>> They sure are.
>>>
>>> It's the old "wave a bunch of public money under the pleb's noses and buy
>>> some votes".
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards.
>>> Noddy.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Two things
>> How many people who own a pre 95 car would be in a position to buy a new
>> car? even with $2000 extra
>> And
>> How does trading in their old car take it off the road??
>> is there a directive that the traded cars on this scheme be scrapped by
>> the dealer? and does there have to be confirmation that it is destroyed?
>> or is it listed on the write or register to never be registered on road
>> and the engine number not used again?
>>
>>
>> Kev
>>
>>
>
> And we've all seen how well schemes like *that* have worked so far,
> haven't we?
>

What happens to the cars after. Are they to be destroyed the same as the
yanks did.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0IcIxhd8ks

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Prev: Trucks and right lanes (Vic)
Next: 88 Tarago