Give him a medal
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Speeding - a few questions
Next: Smartcom 12s relay?
From: Tony Raven on 17 Aug 2006 13:40 Sharon O. wrote on 17/08/2006 10:42 +0100: >> Que..? > > It's actually 'Qu'. > I thought it was Qu? -- Tony "Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
From: Titus McHunt on 17 Aug 2006 14:26 "Tony Raven" <junk(a)raven-family.com> wrote in message >>> Que..? >> >> It's actually 'Qu'. >> > > I thought it was Qu? If I had a bag full of rat's arses I would keep the lot.
From: Richard Brookman on 17 Aug 2006 15:19 Mary Fisher wrote: || "Richard Brookman" <richard.brookmanpants(a)btinternet.com> wrote in || message news:4kerfaFbum9vU1(a)individual.net... ||| MrBitsy wrote: ||| ||||| Two way radio conversation between police and control, are ||||| pre-learnt short phrases. They are talking about the task in hand, ||||| so require much less concentration. ||| ||| And they end with "Out", not: ||| ||| OK then ||| OK then ||| See ya ||| Yeah, see ya ||| Love yoooo ||| Love yoooo ||| <giggle> OK then ||| OK then ||| Tara then ||| Yeah, tara ||| By the way, did you get the milk? ||| Nah, sorry ||| Can you... ||| Christ, where'd he come from? || || You forgot: || || No, you hang up ... :-) -- Rich ============================== I don't approve of signatures, so I don't have one.
From: PC Paul on 17 Aug 2006 16:09 Richard Brookman wrote: >|| >|| You forgot: >|| >|| No, you hang up ... > > :-) I used to suffer wiuth that, then one day, I discovered the answer: "No, you hang <click>......"
From: Alex Heney on 17 Aug 2006 17:34
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 03:41:20 GMT, JAF <anarchSPAMKILLER(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:33:17 +0100, Alex Heney <me8(a)privacy.net> wrote: > >>On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:47:20 GMT, JAF <anarchSPAMKILLER(a)ntlworld.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:23:45 +0100, "DieSea" >>><DieSea.NoSpamPlease(a)ntlworldd.ccom> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>>Then he tied to over take me on the inside lane >>>> >>>How pleased I am to see someone say 'overtake on the inside', rather than >>>the utterly, utterly *wrong* usage of 'undertake'. >>> >> >>Any concept of an idea as to why you think it is "wrong"? >> >>It has become accepted usage. That is how languages evolve. > >So? So why do you claim it is "wrong"? -- Alex Heney, Global Villager Sleep is a poor substitute for caffeine. To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom |