From: bod on
Adrian wrote:
> "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> gurgled happily, sounding much
> like they were saying:
>
>>>> Point of order. Driving a car in excess of 70mph cannot under any
>>>> circumstances be "perfectly safe".
>
>>> Really? How do you figure that?
>>>
>>> Have you considered the speeds at which much motorway traffic travel,
>>> and the fact that motorways are the safest roads in the UK by a long
>>> chalk?
>
>> That may be so.
>>
>> But it cannot be "perfectly" safe as a number of things could happen
>> that could cause death or injury. Apart from the extremely unlikely
>> (such as being struck by a meteorite) there are other things (unlikely
>> but still quite possible) such as hitting debris on the carriageway,
>> mechanical failure, another driver falling asleep, being drunk etc. etc
>> etc.
>>
>> Fairly safe yes. Perfectly safe no.
>
> In that case, breathing is far from "perfectly safe".
>
>

Yup, the 'death and taxes' cliche.

Bod
From: boltar2003 on
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:58:51 +0100
"mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
>> No doubt you're some self righteous old fart who drives a rover or volvo
>> and
>> doesn't give a rats backside about the huge tailback behind him.
>
>I lead the car train :o)
>
>And I obey the law.

Thats a "yes" then. Thought as much.

B2003

From: mileburner on

<boltar2003(a)boltar.world> wrote in message
news:i0k8a5$1ds$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:58:51 +0100
> "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
>>> No doubt you're some self righteous old fart who drives a rover or volvo
>>> and
>>> doesn't give a rats backside about the huge tailback behind him.
>>
>>I lead the car train :o)
>>
>>And I obey the law.
>
> Thats a "yes" then. Thought as much.
>
> B2003

I deny that I have ever driven a Rover. I no longer drive Volvos.


From: bod on
mileburner wrote:
> <boltar2003(a)boltar.world> wrote in message
> news:i0k8a5$1ds$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:58:51 +0100
>> "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>> No doubt you're some self righteous old fart who drives a rover or volvo
>>>> and
>>>> doesn't give a rats backside about the huge tailback behind him.
>>> I lead the car train :o)
>>>
>>> And I obey the law.
>> Thats a "yes" then. Thought as much.
>>
>> B2003
>
> I deny that I have ever driven a Rover. I no longer drive Volvos.
>
>

Mobility scooter? :)

Bod
From: mileburner on

"bod" <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:895qd2Fa61U1(a)mid.individual.net...
> mileburner wrote:
>> <boltar2003(a)boltar.world> wrote in message
>> news:i0k8a5$1ds$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>>> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:58:51 +0100
>>> "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>>> No doubt you're some self righteous old fart who drives a rover or
>>>>> volvo
>>>>> and
>>>>> doesn't give a rats backside about the huge tailback behind him.
>>>> I lead the car train :o)
>>>>
>>>> And I obey the law.
>>> Thats a "yes" then. Thought as much.
>>>
>>> B2003
>>
>> I deny that I have ever driven a Rover. I no longer drive Volvos.
>
> Mobility scooter? :)

My present car displays the letters TDi and SE but I do not know what they
mean.

Though since you raise the issue of mobility scooters, perhaps it might be a
good idea for those who normally drive cars for journeys of just a few miles
to use them instead.