From: Ret. on
Conor wrote:
> On 18/03/2010 17:18, Ret. wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that in the not too-distant
>> future, using a mobile phone while driving will be completely banned.
>> The 'hands-free' issue is just ridiculous when all the evidence shows
>> that it is the actual conversation that is the distraction
>
> So they're going to ban people talking to each other in a car then?

Have you actually read *any* of the posts on this thread? The research that
has been referred to makes it very clear that there is a major difference
between chatting to a passenger and talking to someone on a mobile phone.
You may not think there is - but numerous pieces of research shows clearly
that there *is*.

>
> And you don't see a problem with the police state we're rapidly
> heading towards?

I don't see a problem with legislation intended to make our roads safer. We
managed perfectly well before mobile phones came along - I'm quite sure that
we can manage perfectly well without using them when driving again.

Kev

From: boltar2003 on
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:26:42 -0000
"Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Of course it does beg the question of why 2 way radios are still legal to
>> use
>> in moving vehicles. Theres little difference as far as I can see between
>> chatting on the phone and chatting on a CB or police radio.
>>
>Because one doesn't "chat" on a radio.

One most certainly does. On CB at any rate, thats the whole point of it.

B2003

From: Ret. on
Bod wrote:
> On 18/03/2010 16:57, Ret. wrote:
>> Conor wrote:
>>> On 18/03/2010 12:14, Ret. wrote:
>>>
>>>> *After* a crash has occurred - or before?
>>>>
>>>
>>> So seeing as you think its so dangerous, what caused all the
>>> accidents before the mobile phone was invented? What about those
>>> from before even car radios were common?
>>
>> All the research shows that conducting a conversation on a mobile
>> phone is particularly distracting when driving. It has been tested,
>> over and over again, using different people in different countries -
>> and all the tests show the same thing - reaction times are slower,
>> hazard perception is reduced, etc.
>>
>> Using a mobile phone simply makes a driver less safe - and that's a
>> fact. Kev
>>
>>
> Whenever I receive a call (via handsfree), I answer and say I'll ring
> you back when I can find a safe place to pull over and return the
> call.

Indeed. I've just this minute got back from a trip into town. Half way home
my mobile rang and I answered it on my handsfree kit. The caller was Asian
and immediately I was having to concentrate harder on what he was saying. I
knew there was a lay-by up ahead so just told him I was driving and asked
him to hang on 'til I stopped.

The caller was from Linksys and was updating me in a somewhat technical way
about the steps they are taking to resolve a persistent problem I have with
my Linksys router.

The fact that the call was technical - and the caller was Asian - meant that
I needed to devote full concentration to the call. My driving concentration
would undoubtedly have suffered if I had not stopped to take the call.

Kev

From: Mr Benn on

"Conor" <conor(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hnu1in$pjp$4(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> On 18/03/2010 17:18, Ret. wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that in the not too-distant
>> future, using a mobile phone while driving will be completely banned.
>> The 'hands-free' issue is just ridiculous when all the evidence shows
>> that it is the actual conversation that is the distraction
>
> So they're going to ban people talking to each other in a car then?
>
> And you don't see a problem with the police state we're rapidly heading
> towards?

Conor, it has already been explained. Talking to a passenger in a car is
quite different to talking to someone on the end of a phone connection. A
passenger in a car knows when to shut up when a driver had to concentrate.
Someone on the end of a phone will carry on talking which can distract the
driver.

The two are not comparable. If you can't understand that, it's pointless
trying to argue with you.


From: NM on
On 19 Mar, 11:51, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> "Mr Benn" <nos...(a)invalid.invalid> gurgled happily, sounding much like
> they were saying:
>
> > Conor, it has already been explained.  Talking to a passenger in a car
> > is quite different to talking to someone on the end of a phone
> > connection.
>
> No, it isn't.
>
> You might treat it differently, but there really is no inherent
> difference.
>
> > A passenger in a car knows when to shut up when a driver had to
> > concentrate.
>
> Some do, some don't.
>
> > Someone on the end of a phone will carry on talking which can distract
> > the driver.
>
> You don't HAVE to listen to them, y'know.
>
> One thing I'd quite like to know - how does the car stereo know when to
> shut up?

When you push the 'off' button perhaps?