From: Dave Plowman on
In article
<84e7ed21-1e72-4aa8-8f36-705ebf72c01f(a)z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
Doug <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote:
> On 3 June, 14:48, Dave Plowman <d...(a)davesound.co.uk> wrote:
> > In article
> > <77c32089-fdc5-4448-9ffe-f95308737...(a)s41g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
> > Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe you will understand how CM works someday, when you decide to
> > > crawl out of you hierarchical cesspit and escape your conditioning at
> > > last, you and all the others here.
> >
> > Right. You're the only sane one here? Gawd help us...
> >
> No I seem to be the only non-motorist here and who actually takes part
> in CM.

If you're a non motorist, why are you posting to uk.rec.driving? Given you
seem to hate all things non bicycle.

--
*I used up all my sick days so I called in dead

Dave Plowman dave(a)davesound.co.uk London SW 12

From: Tony Dragon on
Doug wrote:
> On 3 June, 14:48, Dave Plowman <d...(a)davesound.co.uk> wrote:
>> In article
>> <77c32089-fdc5-4448-9ffe-f95308737...(a)s41g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
>> Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe you will understand how CM works someday, when you decide to
>>> crawl out of you hierarchical cesspit and escape your conditioning at
>>> last, you and all the others here.
>> Right. You're the only sane one here? Gawd help us...
>>
> No I seem to be the only non-motorist here and who actually takes part
> in CM.
>
> --
> Critical Mass London
> http://www.criticalmasslondon.org.uk
> "More bikes, fewer cars!".

Hmmm, I wonder what that tells us.

--
Tony Dragon
From: Tony Dragon on
Dave Plowman wrote:
> In article
> <84e7ed21-1e72-4aa8-8f36-705ebf72c01f(a)z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
> Doug <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>> On 3 June, 14:48, Dave Plowman <d...(a)davesound.co.uk> wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <77c32089-fdc5-4448-9ffe-f95308737...(a)s41g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
>>> Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe you will understand how CM works someday, when you decide to
>>>> crawl out of you hierarchical cesspit and escape your conditioning at
>>>> last, you and all the others here.
>>> Right. You're the only sane one here? Gawd help us...
>>>
>> No I seem to be the only non-motorist here and who actually takes part
>> in CM.
>
> If you're a non motorist, why are you posting to uk.rec.driving? Given you
> seem to hate all things non bicycle.
>

But he does not use a bicycle, he uses a illegal vehicle that is not
insured.

--
Tony Dragon
From: Doug on
On 3 June, 18:12, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> saying:
>
> >> > Maybe you will understand how CM works someday, when
> >> the current meet point becomes unavailable, and you need to decide
> >> where to meet...
> > How, why would it become unavailable
>
> Given that the meeting point is on the South Bank, outside the NFT - and
> large swathes of the South Bank have been under redevelopment lately, I'd
> have thought it fairly obvious why it might become unavailable.
>
Only temporarily if at all since it is part of a national trail for
walkers and cyclists and blocking it would meet with a great deal of
opposition quite apart from CM.
>
> > and what sort of reactive response by the participants do you envisage?
>
> Well, _somebody's_ going to need to decide on a new meeting point, aren't
> they?
>
> What about if - as part of a redevelopment - the current meeting point
> becomes totally pedestrianised, instead of merely no-motor-vehicles?
> Would CM participants flout that restriction en masse? Or would a
> decision be made to move the meeting point?
>
> If so, who by?
>
Well given your highly unlikely hypothetical, individual's suggestions
for a new meeting place would probably be posted to online discussion
groups, etc., and a consensus finally arrived at. However, if hardly
anyone turned up to that new meeting place and instead spontaneously
turned up somewhere else in London that was familiar and which various
groups of cyclists have used in the past, then that would become the
new meeting place.

Get it?

BTW, referring back to the thread title, I see from the news that
motorcyclists have been doing something similar which Boris objected
to on the grounds that it caused inconvenience to others, which seems
to be the common excuse for trying to suppress the human right of
freedom of assembly and expression.

I do hope those here will condemn the taxi drivers and motorcyclists
as much as they always condemn CM and will also do so to motorists if
they have a demo.

--
Critical Mass London
http://www.criticalmasslondon.org.uk
"More bikes, fewer cars!".


From: Doug on
On 3 June, 19:16, Dave Plowman <d...(a)davesound.co.uk> wrote:
> In article
> <84e7ed21-1e72-4aa8-8f36-705ebf72c...(a)z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
>    Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>
> > On 3 June, 14:48, Dave Plowman <d...(a)davesound.co.uk> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <77c32089-fdc5-4448-9ffe-f95308737...(a)s41g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
> > >    Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Maybe you will understand how CM works someday, when you decide to
> > > > crawl out of you hierarchical cesspit and escape your conditioning at
> > > > last, you and all the others here.
>
> > > Right. You're the only sane one here? Gawd help us...
>
> > No I seem to be the only non-motorist here and who actually takes part
> > in CM.
>
> If you're a non motorist, why are you posting to uk.rec.driving? Given you
> seem to hate all things non bicycle.
>
Because motorists infest uk.rec.cycling, though goodness knows why.

--
Critical Mass London
http://www.criticalmasslondon.org.uk
"More bikes, fewer cars!".