From: Adrian on 16 Apr 2010 05:02 "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>>Well, nobody sane. There's always the Medway Handymong. >> "Handymong"? > Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the derogatory > terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such exchanges, what gives > you the right to make judgments? I'm wondering if JMS/MHM just picked the wrong identity in his/their news client...
From: Brimstone on 16 Apr 2010 05:02 "Bod" <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message news:82qn9kFogbU1(a)mid.individual.net... > On 16/04/2010 09:49, Brimstone wrote: >> >> >> "JMS" <jmsmith2010(a)live.co.uk > wrote in message >> news:sq7fs51lm9ptko5kv79f85lebaohkmojho(a)4ax.com... >>> On 15 Apr 2010 10:11:05 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> JNugent <JN(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> gurgled happily, sounding much >>>> like >>>> they were saying: >>>> >>>>> It is safe to say that in any demonstrable case where a driver or >>>>> motorcyclist had driven or ridden *along* a footway *in the manner of >>>>> a >>>>> cyclist*, no-one here would condemn similarly robust punishment for >>>>> it. >>>> >>>> Well, nobody sane. There's always the Medway Handymong. >>> >>> >>> "Handymong"? >>> >>> Even though you appear to have low IQ and have limited command of >>> English I find use of such contrived derogatory terms extremely >>> distasteful/ >>> >>> >>> I suppose that you think yourself clever. >>> -- >> Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the derogatory >> terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such exchanges, what gives >> you the right to make judgments? > > > > > > He has as much right as you have, to offer his view/s. > Views are one thing, judgments are different.
From: Brimstone on 16 Apr 2010 05:07 "Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:82qnd7Ft3U7(a)mid.individual.net... > "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like > they were saying: > >>>>Well, nobody sane. There's always the Medway Handymong. > >>> "Handymong"? > >> Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the derogatory >> terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such exchanges, what gives >> you the right to make judgments? > > I'm wondering if JMS/MHM just picked the wrong identity in his/their news > client... MHM displays all the tendencies indicating paranoid confusion, so it's highly likely.
From: mileburner on 16 Apr 2010 06:17 "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:bfqdnZE21NIHuVXWnZ2dnUVZ8rCdnZ2d(a)bt.com... > Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the derogatory > terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such exchanges, what gives > you the right to make judgments? Indeed, that is why I do not read and reply to his bile.
From: Nick Finnigan on 16 Apr 2010 13:12
Tony Dragon wrote: > > If the 'footway' is not adopted, how do you know it is a footway? Because it is in a road, outside the carriageway, and separated by a kerb. Not that it matters for the laws relating to parking, riding or driving other than on carriageways. |