From: Adrian on
"Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

>>>Well, nobody sane. There's always the Medway Handymong.

>> "Handymong"?

> Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the derogatory
> terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such exchanges, what gives
> you the right to make judgments?

I'm wondering if JMS/MHM just picked the wrong identity in his/their news
client...
From: Brimstone on


"Bod" <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:82qn9kFogbU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> On 16/04/2010 09:49, Brimstone wrote:
>>
>>
>> "JMS" <jmsmith2010(a)live.co.uk > wrote in message
>> news:sq7fs51lm9ptko5kv79f85lebaohkmojho(a)4ax.com...
>>> On 15 Apr 2010 10:11:05 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> JNugent <JN(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> gurgled happily, sounding much
>>>> like
>>>> they were saying:
>>>>
>>>>> It is safe to say that in any demonstrable case where a driver or
>>>>> motorcyclist had driven or ridden *along* a footway *in the manner of
>>>>> a
>>>>> cyclist*, no-one here would condemn similarly robust punishment for
>>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> Well, nobody sane. There's always the Medway Handymong.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Handymong"?
>>>
>>> Even though you appear to have low IQ and have limited command of
>>> English I find use of such contrived derogatory terms extremely
>>> distasteful/
>>>
>>>
>>> I suppose that you think yourself clever.
>>> --
>> Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the derogatory
>> terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such exchanges, what gives
>> you the right to make judgments?
> >
> >
>
> He has as much right as you have, to offer his view/s.
>
Views are one thing, judgments are different.


From: Brimstone on


"Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:82qnd7Ft3U7(a)mid.individual.net...
> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
> they were saying:
>
>>>>Well, nobody sane. There's always the Medway Handymong.
>
>>> "Handymong"?
>
>> Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the derogatory
>> terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such exchanges, what gives
>> you the right to make judgments?
>
> I'm wondering if JMS/MHM just picked the wrong identity in his/their news
> client...

MHM displays all the tendencies indicating paranoid confusion, so it's
highly likely.


From: mileburner on

"Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bfqdnZE21NIHuVXWnZ2dnUVZ8rCdnZ2d(a)bt.com...

> Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the derogatory
> terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such exchanges, what gives
> you the right to make judgments?

Indeed, that is why I do not read and reply to his bile.


From: Nick Finnigan on
Tony Dragon wrote:
>
> If the 'footway' is not adopted, how do you know it is a footway?


Because it is in a road, outside the carriageway, and separated by a kerb.

Not that it matters for the laws relating to parking, riding or driving
other than on carriageways.