Justice at last
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Tom Crispin on 16 Apr 2010 14:08 On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:51:08 +0100, JMS <jmsmith2010(a)live.co.uk > wrote: >I misunderstood you. Indeed - I asked a question, not made an assertion.
From: Tony Dragon on 16 Apr 2010 14:50 The Medway Handyman wrote: > Brimstone wrote: >> "Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:82qnd7Ft3U7(a)mid.individual.net... >>> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much >>> like they were saying: >>> >>>>>> Well, nobody sane. There's always the Medway Handymong. >>>>> "Handymong"? >>>> Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the >>>> derogatory terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such >>>> exchanges, what gives you the right to make judgments? >>> I'm wondering if JMS/MHM just picked the wrong identity in his/their >>> news client... >> MHM displays all the tendencies indicating paranoid confusion, so it's >> highly likely. > > So now you are a qualified psychiatrist are you? > > As usual the tread has gone right over your head. > > Freudian slip? -- Tony Dragon
From: Nick Finnigan on 16 Apr 2010 15:08 Tom Crispin wrote: > > It is private land. Are the police or council likely to become > involved with parking on a private footway? It is not likely, but it looks possible under the GLC (GP) Act, section 15 - there is no requirement for the road to be adopted. http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?ActiveTextDocId=3476011
From: Steve Firth on 18 Apr 2010 05:49 McKevvy <vicko_zoomba(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > <waits for Dougs response> Time passed, slowly... <tumbleweed>
From: Tom Crispin on 18 Apr 2010 16:24
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:15:26 +0100, "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> Sussex Police confirmed they were called but no action has been taken >> against the cyclist. > >But a vulnerable person was hurt! Surely the person driving the bigger, >heavier vehicle should be prosecuted? Agreed. If Sussex police know who the culprit is they should press charges of wanton and furious cycling. Clearly the cyclist was not in control of his bicycle and an innocent toddler suffered. It would then be up to the courts to decide if the culprit was guilty or innocent of a crime. Either way, he is fully responsible for the consequence. |