Justice at last
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: The Medway Handyman on 16 Apr 2010 13:26 Brimstone wrote: > "Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:82qnd7Ft3U7(a)mid.individual.net... >> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much >> like they were saying: >> >>>>> Well, nobody sane. There's always the Medway Handymong. >> >>>> "Handymong"? >> >>> Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the >>> derogatory terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such >>> exchanges, what gives you the right to make judgments? >> >> I'm wondering if JMS/MHM just picked the wrong identity in his/their >> news client... > > MHM displays all the tendencies indicating paranoid confusion, so it's > highly likely. So now you are a qualified psychiatrist are you? As usual the tread has gone right over your head. -- Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.
From: The Medway Handyman on 16 Apr 2010 13:27 mileburner wrote: > "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:bfqdnZE21NIHuVXWnZ2dnUVZ8rCdnZ2d(a)bt.com... > >> Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the derogatory >> terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such exchanges, what >> gives you the right to make judgments? > > Indeed, that is why I do not read and reply to his bile. Some of the long words I use must be a real trial for you. -- Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.
From: JMS jmsmith2010 on 16 Apr 2010 13:44 On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:49:23 +0100, "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote: <snip> >Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the derogatory terms >inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such exchanges, what gives you the >right to make judgments? So you see nothing wrong with the particular contrived offensive word "handymong"? Like to hazard a guess as to how it's built up? -- Many cyclists are proving the need for registration by their contempt for the Highway Code and laws. The answer: All cyclists over 16 to take compulsory test, have compulsory insurance, and be registered. Registration number to be clearly visible on the back of mandatory hi-viz vest. Habitual law breakers' cycles confiscated and crushed. (With thanks to KeithT for the idea)
From: JMS jmsmith2010 on 16 Apr 2010 13:51 On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:33:35 +0100, Tom Crispin <kije.remove(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote: <snip> >>And do you actually know that they are parked illegally. >> >>I would have thought with your public spirited attitude you would have >>already complained to the council and the police. >> >>Have you? Did they ignore you? > >It is private land. Are the police or council likely to become >involved with parking on a private footway? Oh I see - you are now saying it is not illegal to park where they do. Glad we have cleared that up. I misunderstood you. -- "wearing helmets can sometimes increase the chance of a cyclist being involved in an accident." That august body The CTC (They've already had a slap for lying by the ASA)
From: JNugent on 16 Apr 2010 14:05
The Medway Handyman wrote: > Brimstone wrote: >> "Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com>: >>>>>> Well, nobody sane. There's always the Medway Handymong. >>>>> "Handymong"? >>>> Medway Handymong is extremely abusive and deserves all the >>>> derogatory terms inflicted upon him. He appears to enjoy such >>>> exchanges, what gives you the right to make judgments? >>> I'm wondering if JMS/MHM just picked the wrong identity in his/their >>> news client... >> MHM displays all the tendencies indicating paranoid confusion, so it's >> highly likely. > So now you are a qualified psychiatrist are you? > As usual the tread has gone right over your head. Tyred? |