From: Peter Grange on
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:26:16 GMT, "The Medway Handyman"
<davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

>spam-spam-spam(a)ntlworld.com wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:12:27 GMT
>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> I've just e mailed btinternet to request your name & address.
>>
>> How are you going to prove that the person who posted as mileburner is
>> the owner of the BT email address?
>
>TBH I don't know, but I know people who can find out. For a start I'll have
>his bt account suspended. He appears well known on radical cycling groups,
>shouldn't be hard to track him down.

Should you ever have be involved in a collision between your car and a
cyclist, "The only good cyclist is a dead cyclist" could come back to
haunt you.

--

Pete - The Tax Paying Driving Licence Owning Cyclist
From: mileburner on

"The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:sUgSm.11919$Ym4.9788(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> spam-spam-spam(a)ntlworld.com wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:12:27 GMT
>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> I've just e mailed btinternet to request your name & address.
>>
>> How are you going to prove that the person who posted as mileburner is
>> the owner of the BT email address?
>
> TBH I don't know, but I know people who can find out. For a start I'll
> have his bt account suspended. He appears well known on radical cycling
> groups, shouldn't be hard to track him down.

Reminds me of that song from the Wizard of Oz "If I only had a brain"...


From: mileburner on

"The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:vHgSm.11917$Ym4.5546(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> mileburner wrote:
>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>> message news:6idSm.11847$Ym4.9587(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>>> mileburner wrote:
>>
>>>> The same people will undoubtedly be declaring
>>>> their vehicle cost (including VED) as a bona fide business expense
>>>> and evading tax even further.
>>>
>>> It is a bona fide business expense. Its not evading tax at all.
>>
>> Not when you are taking cash and putting it in your back pocket
>> without declaring it and then claiming your running costs as a
>> business expense.
>
> Are you acusing me of tax fraud on a public newsgroup?

Are you assuming that the above comment implicates anyone in particular?

The lady doth protest too much - methinks.


From: mileburner on

"Peter Grange" <peter(a)plgrange.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:g08jh55r01q58jaaeopemgiml9d5saqr45(a)4ax.com...
>
> Should you ever have be involved in a collision between your car and a
> cyclist, "The only good cyclist is a dead cyclist" could come back to
> haunt you.

Since that comment he is fair game. It was thoroughly offensive and only
serves to incite hatred and violence.

If he had half a brain, he could track me down, but he doesn't so therefore
he can't.

The Medway Handyman is also posting using a "from" address at the domain
"nospamblueyonder.co.uk" This domain appears to be registered to someone
else. I suspect that if Virginmedia received a complaint about this they
would suspend his account.


From: The Medway Handyman on
mileburner wrote:
> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
> message news:vHgSm.11917$Ym4.5546(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> mileburner wrote:
>>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>> message news:6idSm.11847$Ym4.9587(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>>>> mileburner wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The same people will undoubtedly be declaring
>>>>> their vehicle cost (including VED) as a bona fide business expense
>>>>> and evading tax even further.
>>>>
>>>> It is a bona fide business expense. Its not evading tax at all.
>>>
>>> Not when you are taking cash and putting it in your back pocket
>>> without declaring it and then claiming your running costs as a
>>> business expense.
>>
>> Are you acusing me of tax fraud on a public newsgroup?
>
> Are you assuming that the above comment implicates anyone in
> particular?

Since the post was in reply to one I made and the words 'you' and 'your' are
used and you have coveniently snipped the;

"but at the same time you are fiddling
your own tax and stealing the money you owe. Not only are you avoiding the
tax you are required to pay, you are stealing money which is not yours.

You really are a hypocrite and a dispicable theif".
>
> The lady doth protest too much - methinks.

You have well & truly overstepped the mark pal.


--
Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist