From: mileburner on

"The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:uUpSm.11996$Ym4.7207(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...

> You have well & truly overstepped the mark pal.

Don't you see the irony?

Someone who fiddles their own tax who complains about those who do not pay
the tax they are not subjected to.


From: mileburner on

"Huge" <Huge(a)nowhere.much.invalid> wrote in message
news:7nuum0F3m7nm7U2(a)mid.individual.net...

> Much too long. What you mean is "Cyclists will never accept that they are
> freeloaders."

Possibly because that statement is incorrect.

Ho Hum...


From: Adrian on
"The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> gurgled happily,
sounding much like they were saying:

>>> I've just e mailed btinternet to request your name & address.

>> How are you going to prove that the person who posted as mileburner is
>> the owner of the BT email address?

> TBH I don't know, but I know people who can find out. For a start I'll
> have his bt account suspended. He appears well known on radical cycling
> groups, shouldn't be hard to track him down.

<pulls up comfy chair, popcorn>
This is going to be entertaining.
From: Adrian on
"The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> gurgled happily,
sounding much like they were saying:

> Did it ever occur to you numb brain, that many people will agree that
> cyclists are a freeloading PITA and that this could improve business?

Well, it's certainly a well-known fact that the Medway towns are peopled
almost entirely with knuckle-dragging fuckwits, so that theory may well
have legs.
From: SW on
On 5 Dec, 12:22, webreader <websiterea...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> The simple truth is that a motorist will pay more into the system that
> a cyclist, who is not a motorist, will pay (given the same personal
> circumstances)
>

The important point being that the vast majority of cyclists *are*
contributing towards the costs of maintaining the highways, regardless
of the method of taxation.

SW