From: Clocky on
PhilD wrote:
> "Clocky" <notgonn(a)happen.com> wrote in message
> news:4c4c1b18$0$28646$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
>> PhilD wrote:
>>> "atec77" <atec77(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:i2grq6$bt3$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> On 25/07/2010 5:26 PM, PhilD wrote:
>>>>> "Clocky"<notgonn(a)happen.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4c4ad353$0$28649$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
>>>>>> F Murtz wrote:
>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote:
>>>>>>>>> PHATRS wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/10 10:48, who where wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/mp/7631821/all-day-40km-h-zone-plan-backed/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently the 90 minutes each morning and afternoon aren't
>>>>>>>>>>> enough for some. Now it seems there are more parents/carers
>>>>>>>>>>> (who *should* be able to look out for themselves near a
>>>>>>>>>>> road?) and children (why are they there?) outside those
>>>>>>>>>>> hours, seemingly necessitating the all-day speed curfew.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No mention of the impact on the road toll, before 40km zones
>>>>>>>>>> were implemented or after the permanent limit is in place.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lots of talk about fines though.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And the council guy says they are concerned about cost to
>>>>>>>>>> change the signs. It's all about the money folks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ben
>>>>>>>>> There Is a minor reduction in toll at zones but an increase
>>>>>>>>> elsewhere as school zones are a completely wrong way to teach
>>>>>>>>> road safety to young learning minds
>>>>>>>>> They get conditioned about roads at school zones and when they
>>>>>>>>> have a real road to contend with, they get run over.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's up to parents to teach them how to cross roads starting
>>>>>>>> from as soon as they start to walk.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If kids don't know how to cross a road by the time they go to
>>>>>>>> school it's not the system that has failed the child...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But they don't, so the govt puts these stupid non effective
>>>>>>> school zone restrictions on that don't drop the overall child
>>>>>>> accident rates, instead of training schoolchildren properly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Parents shold have taught their kids properly before they even
>>>>>> make it to
>>>>>> school age.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Spoken like someone who has never had kids. It doesn't matter how
>>>>> you try to
>>>>> educate them as to road rules when in a moment of madness they
>>>>> suddenly dart
>>>>> across the road or walk out in front of the bus they just got out
>>>>> of for so
>>>>> many reasons. It does happen. It happened to my own son. He had no
>>>>> reason to
>>>>> cross the road from the bus stop he and some others were waiting
>>>>> at, but for
>>>>> some stupid reason they decided to have races to see who could
>>>>> touch the fence across the road. The car just pulled up as it
>>>>> touched him and he got
>>>>> away with very minor abrasions. He then learnt his lesson but up
>>>>> till then
>>>>> we thought that we had trained him well.
>>>>>
>>>>> PhilD
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You missed the point
>>>> some ferrels find teaching children things like respect and work
>>>> ethic when they have zero themselves
>>>> makes it hard for the rest of us
>>>>
>>> The previous comment was about school zones and teaching kids to not
>>> have an accident crossing the road, so where was my comment not on
>>> topic?
>>
>> It's on-topic but I think you missed the point.
>>
> Then get to the point that I'm apparently missing.
>
>> Clearly you see the point and benefits of teaching your kids - don't
>> you wish all parents did the same? You can see what benefits
>> teaching respect and a sense of responsibility from an early age
>> brings to society as a whole, right?
> There's 2 subjects being discussed here and I was only commenting on
> the accident prevention one as I had no problem with the other about
> responsibilities. I object to the blanket answer that parents
> teaching their kids fixes the problem. Even if all parents taught
> their kids you would still have accidents. They learn from so many
> different sources, especially from bad sources, that parents have
> little control over. It's a bit like some safety signs that we used
> to have in the workplace dunnies stuck to mirrors. They stated that
> "You are looking at the person responsible for your own safety". I
> wanted them removed because they are complete bullshit. You can be as
> safe as you like but there's always someone who can cause you to have
> an accident.

So it should say "You are responsible for everyones safety" ;-)




From: who where on
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:58:00 +0800, "Clocky" <notgonn(a)happen.com>
wrote:

>who where wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 10:24:19 +0800, "Clocky" <notgonn(a)happen.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> who where wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 00:07:28 +1000, atec77 <atec77(a)hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> (snip)
>>>>> If these kids are a product of modern high schools then bring back
>>>>> the cane and other forms of smashing them into shape
>>>>
>>>> No, they are a product of three things, in chronological order.
>>>>
>>>> 1. Parents who failed to teach/control/discipline them before they
>>>> ever start school.
>>>>
>>>> 2. A school system where the teachers aren't allowed to say
>>>> anything negative to/about the evil monsters or say anything but
>>>> praise in their reports.
>>>>
>>>> 3. A school system where the dunderheads who can't/won't learn
>>>> can't be kept down (aka repeat the year) and so - when they fall
>>>> off the learning cart - become a drag on the system which should be
>>>> able to aim its effort at least as high as the average kid, instead
>>>> of having to devote extra time to the knuckle-dragging sector.
>>>
>>> 3/3 top of the class for you.
>>
>> Meh! Easy stuff. SWMBO is a primary teacher ...
>
>Heh, not just a curriculum follower but a real teacher that knows stuff then
>presumably ;-)

Well, she was a aprent of three before even considering teaching as a
career. So that's a yes.
From: Mr.T on
>The looneys are now running the bin ....

Now?
Haven't they always?

MrT.


From: Kev on
Toby wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 01:53:19 +1000, Kev posited in:
>
>> 1am we were told not to drive around the back streets. Might
>> wake someone up
>
> Nonsense - at 1AM everyone in New Farm is either pissed, drooged or rooting
> one another - or all three, come to think of it.
>


yeah well that may have been true 20 years ago
but since the yuppies were conned into spending big on a room in a
fucked old building they were all complaining about the sound of city
traffic, it a City of all things


Kev
From: Albm&ctd on
In article <6k7h7m5ij807.1565vq7ylazdf$.dlg(a)40tude.net>, me(a)privacy.net says...
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:03:14 +1000, Albm&ctd posited in:
>
> > In article <37dl46tcaoet3v3nnh9f451fd3camcip70(a)4ax.com>, noone(a)home.net says...
> >> On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:18:07 +1000, "George W Frost"
> >> <georgewfrost(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>"F Murtz" <haggisz(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:4c4a5495$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> >>>> Clocky wrote:
> >>>>> F Murtz wrote:
> >>>>>> PHATRS wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 23/07/10 10:48, who where wrote:
> >>>>>>>> http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/mp/7631821/all-day-40km-h-zone-plan-backed/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Apparently the 90 minutes each morning and afternoon aren't enough
> >>>>>>>> for some. Now it seems there are more parents/carers (who *should*
> >>>>>>>> be able to look out for themselves near a road?) and children (why
> >>>>>>>> are they there?) outside those hours, seemingly necessitating the
> >>>>>>>> all-day speed curfew.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No mention of the impact on the road toll, before 40km zones were
> >>>>>>> implemented or after the permanent limit is in place.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Lots of talk about fines though.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And the council guy says they are concerned about cost to change the
> >>>>>>> signs. It's all about the money folks.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ben
> >>>>>> There Is a minor reduction in toll at zones but an increase elsewhere
> >>>>>> as school zones are a completely wrong way to teach road safety to
> >>>>>> young learning minds
> >>>>>> They get conditioned about roads at school zones and when they have a
> >>>>>> real road to contend with, they get run over.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's up to parents to teach them how to cross roads starting from as soon
> >>>>> as
> >>>>> they start to walk.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If kids don't know how to cross a road by the time they go to school it's
> >>>>> not the system that has failed the child...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> But they don't, so the govt puts these stupid non effective school zone
> >>>> restrictions on that don't drop the overall child accident rates, instead
> >>>> of training schoolchildren properly.
> >>>
> >>>Whatever happened to the local copper going to the school once a week giving
> >>>the kids road use instructions
> >>
> >> Dunno, but the local copper giving them a firm clout behind the ear
> >> the first time they got caught shoplifting is another effective
> >> training method that has sadly (long) gone by the wayside.
> >>
> >> Now, primary school teachers are expected to instil everything from
> >> values to social behaviour, and this to a horde who no longer show any
> >> respect for their elders or society in general. Parents need to lift
> >> their game big time.
> >>
> > Ashley, the government has taken over the parenting role.
> > Just a quick look on the net to find what may be abuse:
> >
> > "Emotional Abuse occurs when a child's parent or caregiver repeatedly rejects
> > the child or uses threats to frighten the child. This may involve name calling,
> > put downs or continual coldness from the parent or caregiver, to the extent that
> > it significantly damages the child's physical, social, intellectual or emotional
> > development."
> >
> > Is it any wonder that the female role is to simply drop them out and drop them
> > off for someone else to take care of?
> >
> > Al
>
> Hmm, and just how is one supposed to deal with a thouroughgoing little
> arsehole these days, huh?
>
Sell them at $5 a kilo for medical experiments, brain transplants with monkeys
etc?

Al
--
I don't take sides.
It's more fun to insult everyone.
http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html