From: boltar2003 on
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:09:52 +0100
"Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
><boltar2003(a)boltar.world> wrote in message
>news:hpkcj9$ce6$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8 Apr 2010 10:19:50 GMT
>> Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>"Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
>>>they were saying:
>>>
>>>>>> Oh, look - a car with an old-style cable throttle. No electronics in
>>>>>> the throttle mechanism at all. Also another driver who seemed to be
>>>>>> unable to comprehend "switching the ignition off" or "putting it in
>>>>>> neutral".
>>>
>>>>> If you knew anything at all about the subject you would know that
>>>>> doesn't always work.
>>>
>>>> How does turning the ignition off not stop the engine?
>>>
>>>In the same way as putting it in neutral doesn't prevent the engine
>>>driving the wheels, probably.
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>WWOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSHHHHH!!

Ooops, I didn't follow the thread properly. I thought you 2 were having a
private argument which would have been a bit odd with Adrian arguing against
himself (or maybe not). I hadn't noticed Doug had snuck in up there!

B2003

From: Chris Bartram on
On 08/04/2010 11:11, Doug wrote:

> If you knew anything at all about the subject you would know that
> doesn't always work.
If you'd care to explain to me how in that case it wouldn't work, I'd be
fascinated.
From: Derek Geldard on
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 03:11:23 -0700 (PDT), Doug <jagmad(a)riseup.net>
wrote:


>> You do like the Daily Mailodrama as a source, don't you?
>>
>> Oh, look - a car with an old-style cable throttle. No electronics in the
>> throttle mechanism at all. Also another driver who seemed to be unable to
>> comprehend "switching the ignition off" or "putting it in neutral".
>>
>If you knew anything at all about the subject you would know that
>doesn't always work.

Help us out ...

In what circumstances would these (and similar) measures not work ?

Since the number of such failures is vanishingly small, single
component failures only IYP.

>>
>> >> > for anyone who is remotely interested, which rules out a lot of
>> >> > motorists of course, who have their own all too obvious agenda.
>> >> Strange how you, apparently, don't have any kind of "agenda".
>> > My agenda here is public safety.
>>
>> Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!
>>
>Is that the best you can do, just laugh at the deaths?

You expected him to maybe, re-animate them first, before the party
begins ?

That's been bit of a lost art for about 2,000 years.

Derek

From: Chris Bartram on
On 08/04/2010 09:12, Doug wrote:

> Have you ever heard of 'Google searches'? Try it sometime it might
> help.
>
> --
> UK Radical Campaigns
> www.zing.icom43.net
> A driving licence is a licence to kill.

Lets assume I'm too lazy to search through hundreds of hits for whining
idiots who blame the car. Do you have any actual evidence, as opposed to
the hysterical rantings of the moronic?
From: thomas.covenant on
On Apr 8, 9:12 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
> On 8 Apr, 08:31, Chris Bartram <n...(a)delete-me.piglet-net.net> wrote:> On 08/04/2010 07:24, Doug wrote:
>
> > > So I say again, why are these faulty and dangerous cars not taken off
> > > our roads until the faults corrected, instead of keep banging on about
> > > relatively harmless mobility scooters and bicycles?
>
> > And I ask again: has it been proved that the cars have caused any
> > accidents or deaths, or is it the drivers?
>
> > If the connection is proved and the cars are dangerous, then fair
> > enough, take them off the road until it's fixed.
>
> > I realise there's no chance of any sense, but I'll ask anyway.
>
> Have you ever heard of 'Google searches'? Try it sometime it might
> help.
>
> --
> UK Radical Campaignswww.zing.icom43.net
> A driving licence is a licence to kill.

Doug can you help me, I'm having trouble doing Google searches.

Can you do it for me & post the results.

Thomas
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Prev: Driving UK roads
Next: Rip off Kwik Fit