Undertaking MLOCers - pet hate
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: GT on 4 Aug 2010 08:56 "Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel7(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:ffa9589f-f2c1-4046-9b6b-d3bf7a641908(a)f6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... On 4 Aug, 10:55, "GT" <a...(a)b.c> wrote: > "Nick Finnigan" <n...(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message > > news:i39gbq$hip$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > > GT wrote: > >> "Nick Finnigan" <n...(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message > >>news:i36t5e$kvo$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > >>> Which law do you think covers that? > > >> You mean there isn't one? So its legal? > > > Er, yes. That's the way the law works. > > Funny, because one has been quoted here and the police will pull over > anyone > caught breaking it! A law? I don't think so. You speak for the police, do you? Another one putting words into my mouth! Why is it that all the argumentative, rhetorical posters fail to indent their posts properly! To address your half-point; The police enforce the laws in this country, so the above quoted law would be enforced by the police - that is generally how it works in this country!
From: Nick Finnigan on 4 Aug 2010 12:55 GT wrote: > "Nick Finnigan" <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message > news:i39gdq$hip$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> GT wrote: >>> So the policeman who stops Nick for undertaking will have an answer when >> I do not undertake. > > Why not - you implied that it isn't illegal? I didn't imply, I clearly stated that it is not illegal. Neither is banging your head against a brick wall, but I don't do that either.
From: Nick Finnigan on 4 Aug 2010 12:56 GT wrote: > "Nick Finnigan" <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message > news:i39gbq$hip$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> GT wrote: >>> "Nick Finnigan" <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message >>> news:i36t5e$kvo$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> Which law do you think covers that? >>> You mean there isn't one? So its legal? >> Er, yes. That's the way the law works. > > Funny, because one has been quoted here and the police will pull over anyone > caught breaking it! Which law has been quoted here?
From: GT on 5 Aug 2010 05:09 "Nick Finnigan" <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message news:i3c61c$2mk$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > GT wrote: >> "Nick Finnigan" <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:i39gdq$hip$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> GT wrote: >>>> So the policeman who stops Nick for undertaking will have an answer >>>> when >>> I do not undertake. >> >> Why not - you implied that it isn't illegal? > > I didn't imply, I clearly stated that it is not illegal. Neither is > banging your head against a brick wall, but I don't do that either. Ahh - but the police probably won't stop you and charge you for breaking a law if you bang your head on the wall, but they will if you undertake, thereby breaking the dwdca law.
From: GT on 5 Aug 2010 05:09
"Nick Finnigan" <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message news:i3c63g$2mk$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... > GT wrote: >> "Nick Finnigan" <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:i39gbq$hip$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> GT wrote: >>>> "Nick Finnigan" <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message >>>> news:i36t5e$kvo$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> Which law do you think covers that? >>>> You mean there isn't one? So its legal? >>> Er, yes. That's the way the law works. >> >> Funny, because one has been quoted here and the police will pull over >> anyone caught breaking it! > > Which law has been quoted here? Didn't you see Chelsea's post - dwdca. |