Cyclists above the law
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Cunting lorry drivers.
Next: Britain's scariest roads
From: MasonS on 11 Dec 2009 15:39 On 11 Dec, 17:11, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > You and logic, strangers forever, eh? Yes, it beggars belief that my employers have paid me for the last 27 years to work in their Chemistry labs when I cannot grasp basic scientific logic. They must surely rumble me sooner or later! -- Simon Mason
From: MasonS on 11 Dec 2009 15:41 On 11 Dec, 20:31, "The Medway Handyman" <davidl...(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > Mas...(a)BP.com wrote: > > On 11 Dec, 01:06, JNugent <J...(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: > >> Mas...(a)BP.com wrote: > >>> On 10 Dec, 18:33, JNugent <J...(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: > > >>>>> I don't care if it is a cheque or cash, it all comes out of my > >>>>> bank in the long run. If they fiddle their tax returns it's on > >>>>> their conscience, not mine. > >>>> So you always insist on a serialised receipt?- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>> No - once I agree a price and pay up - that's the end of it as far > >>> as I'm concerned. A serialised receipt is no use... > > >> ...to you. > > >> But insisting on it is very helpful to HMRC and your fellow > >> taxpayers.. > > >> But that's apparently not your concern. > > > Don't be so ridiculous. The TRADER is responsible for HIS tax returns, > > not me. > > Should HMRC choose to investigate and find dodgy dealings, they will > investigate the customer as well. If the trader is judged guilty of evading > tax and they suspect collusion they can (& have) prosecute both. > > -- > Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Since I have never had discount for cash, my conscience is clear. -- Simon Mason
From: Peter Grange on 11 Dec 2009 18:02 On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:27:50 GMT, "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >Phil W Lee wrote: >> Peter Grange <peter(a)plgrange.demon.co.uk> considered Thu, 10 Dec 2009 >> 19:36:18 +0000 the perfect time to write: >> >>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:16:40 GMT, "The Medway Handyman" >>> <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> mileburner wrote: >>>>> MasonS(a)BP.com wrote: >>>>>> I stand corrected, he just laughed at my car and clothes then, my >>>>>> apologies. >>>>> >>>>> It is better to be laughed at for you car and clothes, than to be >>>>> laughed at for your lack of ability to comprehend the tax system, >>>>> your hypocrisy, you poor attitude to other road users and your vile >>>>> postings. >>>> >>>> So, suggesting you pay your way counts as a 'vile' posting does it? >>> >>> "The only good cyclist is a dead cyclist" does. >>> >>>> >>>> I suppose it does. You are so adverse to putting your hands in >>>> your pocket the very though must be vile. >>> >>> More bollocks. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist >> >> Best to put it in the killfile I reckon. >> It's impervious to reason or logic, and blind to any facts. >> >> I think it will make a good mate for the J troll, although I must >> admit it worries me what they might produce. > >Resorting to insults again, because you can't justify being a sponging >freeloader? So, if someone suggests you don't pay all the taxes the government requires that's libel, but according to you another person who does pay all such taxes is a sponging freeloader. -- Pete - The Tax Paying Driving Licence Owning Cyclist
From: Steve Firth on 11 Dec 2009 18:42 Phil W Lee <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote: > "Mr Benn" <nospam(a)invalid.invalid> considered Fri, 11 Dec 2009 > 15:15:56 -0000 the perfect time to write: > [snip] > >That's strange. I had though that ethanol released CO2 when burnt. > > > That would be the same carbon that was captured from the atmosphere > when the feedstock (wheat in this example) was grown. > Unlike the case with fossil fuel, which is carbon that has been safely > stored deep in the earth (and hence out of the atmosphere) for > millions of years. Cyclists. How do they manage to cycle any distance when they can't see further than their own nose?
From: JNugent on 11 Dec 2009 18:52
MasonS(a)BP.com wrote: > On 11 Dec, 20:31, "The Medway Handyman" > <davidl...(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >> Mas...(a)BP.com wrote: >>> On 11 Dec, 01:06, JNugent <J...(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: >>>> Mas...(a)BP.com wrote: >>>>> On 10 Dec, 18:33, JNugent <J...(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: >>>>>>> I don't care if it is a cheque or cash, it all comes out of my >>>>>>> bank in the long run. If they fiddle their tax returns it's on >>>>>>> their conscience, not mine. >>>>>> So you always insist on a serialised receipt?- Hide quoted text - >>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>> No - once I agree a price and pay up - that's the end of it as far >>>>> as I'm concerned. A serialised receipt is no use... >>>> ...to you. >>>> But insisting on it is very helpful to HMRC and your fellow >>>> taxpayers.. >>>> But that's apparently not your concern. >>> Don't be so ridiculous. The TRADER is responsible for HIS tax returns, >>> not me. >> Should HMRC choose to investigate and find dodgy dealings, they will >> investigate the customer as well. If the trader is judged guilty of evading >> tax and they suspect collusion they can (& have) prosecute both. >> Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist > Since I have never had discount for cash, my conscience is clear. As I had already pointed out to you before you wrote that, you simply *don't need* to have been offered, nor to have receibved, a "discount for cash" in order to have profited from a VAT evasion. You must have let that slip from your memory. |