From: The Medway Handyman on
mileburner wrote:
> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
> message news:qvCUm.14434$Ym4.1210(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>>
>> The first example was libelous and untrue. The second example
>> reveals your stunted intelligence. Cyclists do not pay any SPECIFIC
>> taxes to use the road and therfore are sponging freeloaders. If you
>> have trouble with that concept show me your cycling tax disc.
>
> I think what TC is trying say is that he accepts that cyclists pay
> their dues like anyone else, and may well pay VED for their cars, but
> they do not need to buy a licence to use their bicycles on the road.

Don't attempt to think, it is clearly beyond your abilities. However much
you attampt to twist it, cyclists don't pay a specific tax to use the roads.
Note 'specific'.
>

--
Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist
--
Q. Why don't they put pockets in lycra cycling shorts?
A. Because cyclists never put their hands in their pockets.


From: Steve Firth on
MasonS(a)BP.com <MasonS(a)BP.com> wrote:

> BP has been named the most environmentally sustainable large oil and gas
> company in the world.

Sadam Hussein better than Idi Amin or Pol Pot.
From: mileburner on
The Medway Handyman wrote:
> mileburner wrote:
>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>> message news:qvCUm.14434$Ym4.1210(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
>>>
>>> The first example was libelous and untrue. The second example
>>> reveals your stunted intelligence. Cyclists do not pay any SPECIFIC
>>> taxes to use the road and therfore are sponging freeloaders. If you
>>> have trouble with that concept show me your cycling tax disc.
>>
>> I think what TC is trying say is that he accepts that cyclists pay
>> their dues like anyone else, and may well pay VED for their cars, but
>> they do not need to buy a licence to use their bicycles on the road.
>
> Don't attempt to think, it is clearly beyond your abilities. However
> much you attampt to twist it, cyclists don't pay a specific tax to
> use the roads. Note 'specific'.

I don't think that anyone has questioned that.

And what has also been pointed out (which you clearly fail to grasp), is
that no-one else pays a tax to "specifically" to use the roads either.

VED (or "road tax") is not a tax to allow you to use the road.


From: mileburner on
MasonS(a)BP.com wrote:
>
> Would it be OK if all of country's millions of bicycles, which would
> be in VED band A (Fee = �0), got a stamped round bit of paper from the
> Post Office and stuck it on their frames? Would that do it for you? I
> wouldn't mind if it made van drivers gave me more respect on the road.

I would happily pay a fee too.

But the fact of the matter is that I can't, because there is no-one to pay
it too.

And if the Medway Highwayman expects cyclists to "pay a tax to use the
roads" he ought to be subject to that tax too!


From: MasonS on
On 12 Dec, 18:11, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
> Mas...(a)BP.com <Mas...(a)BP.com> wrote:
> > BP has been named the most environmentally sustainable large oil and gas
> > company in the world.
>
> Sadam Hussein better than Idi Amin or Pol Pot.

And yet you give them and their like your money, which pays my wages,
so thanks!

--
Simon Mason