Ok cyclists - is this reasonable behaviour?
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Happi Monday on 31 Mar 2010 14:21 On 30/03/2010 19:42, The Medway Handyman wrote: > I don't need to. I'm not stupid enough to use a totally unsuitable form of > transport. No, just stupid, full-stop.
From: The Medway Handyman on 31 Mar 2010 14:37 Happi Monday wrote: > On 30/03/2010 19:42, The Medway Handyman wrote: > >> I don't need to. I'm not stupid enough to use a totally unsuitable >> form of transport. > > No, just stupid, full-stop. Who writes your material for you? -- Dave - the small piece of 14th century armour used to protect the armpit.
From: Adam Lea on 31 Mar 2010 16:21 boltar2003(a)boltar.world wrote: > "I gave him enough room > he wobbled into me at the last second officer. Contradiction!
From: The Medway Handyman on 31 Mar 2010 19:01 Brimstone wrote: > "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in > message news:gkLsn.87728$Vh1.71327(a)newsfe15.ams2... >> Brimstone wrote: >>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >>> message news:Mjrsn.8339$Yx6.341(a)newsfe29.ams2... >>>> mileburner wrote: >>>>> "Tom Crispin" <kije.remove(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote in >>>>> message news:98p2r5luklsib36laecsi8m8o18eg1rov9(a)4ax.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, I pay to use the roads twice, once as a motorist and once >>>>>> as a cyclist. >>>>> >>>>> Only twice Tom? >>>>> >>>>> You are lucky. >>>>> >>>>> I pay as a motorist, cyclist, homeowner, earner, saver, spender, >>>>> the list goes on... >>>> >>>> Motorists pay as motorists, homeowners, earners, savers, spenders. >>>> And they pay a spefic tax to use the roads. >>> >>> That's their choice. >>> >>>> What part of that are you too terminally stupid to understand? >>>> >>> If people pay money to the government that they don't have to, who >>> is it that's stupid? >> >> So - you don't have to pay road tax to use the roads? I'm sure Mr >> Darling will be pleased to know that. >> > Woooosh. It might be if your post made any sense at all. Try using English. -- Dave - the small piece of 14th century armour used to protect the armpit.
From: The Medway Handyman on 31 Mar 2010 19:14
Brimstone wrote: > "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in > message news:Mjrsn.8339$Yx6.341(a)newsfe29.ams2... >> mileburner wrote: >>> "Tom Crispin" <kije.remove(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote in >>> message news:98p2r5luklsib36laecsi8m8o18eg1rov9(a)4ax.com... >>>> >>>> Yes, I pay to use the roads twice, once as a motorist and once as a >>>> cyclist. >>> >>> Only twice Tom? >>> >>> You are lucky. >>> >>> I pay as a motorist, cyclist, homeowner, earner, saver, spender, the >>> list goes on... OK, lets sort this out for the terminally stupid cyclists who think they are clever; >> Motorists pay as motorists, homeowners, earners, savers, spenders. And >> they pay a spefic tax to use the roads. > > That's their choice. What do you mean by that fuckwit? Do they have a choice between not paying road tax and driving illegally? Or do they have a choice between driving a car on the roads or not? Communicating in English would help, if you can manage that. >> What part of that are you too terminally stupid to understand? >> > If people pay money to the government that they don't have to, who is > it that's stupid? I'm not entirely sure who you think 'pays tax they don't have to'? Perhaps you could explain, in English, rather than 'thick'? -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |