Prev: Speeding - a few questions
Next: Smartcom 12s relay?
From: Ivor Jones on 21 Aug 2006 03:31 "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:B9idnWE6dYVQxXTZnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d(a)bt.com > "Ivor Jones" <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote in message > news:4ksbd3Fd6cjpU18(a)individual.net... > > > I don't have to offer an explanation. I have actually > > done so, but you refuse to accept it, in exactly the > > same way I refuse to accept being called a European. > > You have given no explanation as to why your are not > European. Please feel free to do so. I have done so. Ad nauseum. You refuse to accept my explanation. Your problem. Ivor
From: Ivor Jones on 21 Aug 2006 03:32 "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c9udnQLY4rN9ynTZRVny1Q(a)bt.com > "Ivor Jones" <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote in message > news:4ksbd1Fd6cjpU8(a)individual.net... > > "Alex Heney" <me8(a)privacy.net> wrote in message > > news:90ohe2p2em708dre2hu1mn9lv435rigm5l(a)4ax.com [snip] > > > The language used does not alter the validity of the > > > point AT ALL. > > > > It does, purely and simply because it shows the user of > > the swear word to be intellectually incapable of making > > a point without such usage. That in itself is enough to > > convince me that they are wrong. If they were right, > > they would be able to argue their point without > > swearing. > > What a gross insult. Oh dear. It's ok for you to insult me though, isn't it. Ivor
From: Brimstone on 21 Aug 2006 03:47 Ivor Jones wrote: > "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:qKSdnUYXy43HynTZnZ2dnUVZ8qSdnZ2d(a)bt.com >> "Ivor Jones" <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote in message >> news:4ksbd0Fd6cjpU4(a)individual.net... >>> >>> >>> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:XbqdndHArPPGXnXZRVnytg(a)bt.com >>>> Ivor Jones wrote: >>>>> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mq6dnQFcQcnfInXZnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d(a)bt.com >>>>>> Ivor Jones wrote: >>>>>>> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>> message news:z76dnc5GefPmKXXZRVnyjA(a)bt.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [snip] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you not want to be called something >>>>>>>> that you are? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because I am not what you believe me to be. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you believe I believe you to be? >>>>> >>>>> A European, of course. But then you knew that. >>>> >>>> So if you're not European, from which continent or >>>> other geographic region of the world do your forebears >>>> originate? >>> >>> Irrelevant. Whether they are or were European or not >>> does not mean I am. >> >> Wrong, you can't be anything other than what your parents >> were. > > Don't be so daft. You have already been proven wrong by others on that > particular theme. Not so. > Everyone is an individual. Not to the degree that you're trying to force upon everyone else. > >>> You may think otherwise, but you'd be wrong. >> >> How so? > > You've been told already. No, you've only said what you consider yourself not to be, not what you are. Tell us what you are and we'll all take a rest. > >>> Once again, I ask you to have respect for my wishes and >>> beliefs. Show that you have *some* regard for others. >> >> Stop treating the rest of us as idiots and I'm sure there >> will be reciprication. > > You first. Since you chose to start this discussion, no one else can end it. Therefore you will have to provide a tangible reason why you are not European since all the evidence you've offered so far indicates that you are.
From: Brimstone on 21 Aug 2006 03:48 Ivor Jones wrote: > "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:c9udnQLY4rN9ynTZRVny1Q(a)bt.com >> "Ivor Jones" <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote in message >> news:4ksbd1Fd6cjpU8(a)individual.net... >>> "Alex Heney" <me8(a)privacy.net> wrote in message >>> news:90ohe2p2em708dre2hu1mn9lv435rigm5l(a)4ax.com > > [snip] > >>>> The language used does not alter the validity of the >>>> point AT ALL. >>> >>> It does, purely and simply because it shows the user of >>> the swear word to be intellectually incapable of making >>> a point without such usage. That in itself is enough to >>> convince me that they are wrong. If they were right, >>> they would be able to argue their point without >>> swearing. >> >> What a gross insult. > > Oh dear. It's ok for you to insult me though, isn't it. I haven't insulted you in any way, shape or form. I'm trying to understand what it is about you that is not European.
From: Brimstone on 21 Aug 2006 03:49
Ivor Jones wrote: > "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:B9idnWE6dYVQxXTZnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d(a)bt.com >> "Ivor Jones" <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote in message >> news:4ksbd3Fd6cjpU18(a)individual.net... >> >>> I don't have to offer an explanation. I have actually >>> done so, but you refuse to accept it, in exactly the >>> same way I refuse to accept being called a European. >> >> You have given no explanation as to why your are not >> European. Please feel free to do so. > > I have done so. Ad nauseum. You refuse to accept my explanation. Your > problem. No you haven't, you've only said what you are not. |